"In painting, one should avoid worrying about accomplishing a work that is too diligent and too finished in the depiction of forms and notation of colors or one that makes too great a display of one's technique, thus depriving it of mystery and aura. That is why one should not fear the incomplete, but quite to the contrary, one should deplore that which is too complete. From the moment one knows that a thing is complete, what need is there to complete it? For the incomplete does not necessarily mean the unfulfilled."
Where has this quote been all my life???? Or at least the last several years when I've been staring at my stacks of nearly complete/ just started canvases with feelings of shame and regret?
The wonderful quote above is by a Tang dynasty historian named Chang Yen-Yuan; you can read the original Art in America article, "To Rest Lightly on the Earth" by Raphael Rubinstein here.
This is the lecture I mentioned in my earlier On the Spot! post during my painting class. My painting teacher reminded our class that Duchamp always felt that it was the viewer who in fact completed the painting experience. I think, in a lot of ways, paintings are like books: the experience of reading the story varies for each person, each time they read it. Every person brings something different to the table and interprets a painting, or a poem or whatever, in their own way. A fellow student added that at grad schools they never talk about paintings in terms of whether or not it's "complete" but whether or not it's "resolved." I need to start looking at my work in that way.
Such fabulous stuff, really. I wish there was a class entirely devoted to exploring individual creative process and art "theory."
Such fabulous stuff, really. I wish there was a class entirely devoted to exploring individual creative process and art "theory."





